pinag-uusapan lang namin last Sunday ang pag-interrogate ni Trillanes kay Reyes sa Senate hearing. Meron kasing dalawang factions dito: yung isa na nagsasabing grabe namang magtanong si Trillanes parang hindi PMAer, at sa kanilang banda may nagsasabi naman na tama lang ang pagtatanong ni Trillanes.
buong araw kanina, ang pagkamatay ni Angelo Reyes ang usap-usapan. sa Facebook, meron din dalawang factions: yung isa nagsasabing igalang ang kamatayan niya at yung isa naman ay yung mga naniniwalang pag-admit ng guilt ang ginawa nya. ano palagay nyo?
Eto nga pala ang sinabi ni Senator Miriam tungkol sa implikasyon ng pagkamatay ni Reyes sa imbestigasyon:
The senator said, the Penal Code provides that the obligation to make restoration or reparation for damages devolves upon his heirs.
Thus, Santiago said, Reyes' wife and children would be obliged to restore whatever property may be proved to have been acquired by illegal means.
In lieu of the deceased, Santiago said, the wife and their children may be summoned to the Senate hearing to investigate whether they have become liable under the Anti-Graft Act.
“This law prohibits any person and family relation, including the spouse or relatives by consanguinity or affinity in the third civil degree,“to capitalize or exploit such family relation by directly or indirectly receiving any pecuniary advantage from any other person having some business with the deceased in which the deceased had to intervene,” she pointed out.
If proven guilty, Santiago said, the wife, children, and in-laws could be charged under the Anti-Graft Act and punished with up to 15 years imprisonment, and with confiscation or forfeiture in favor of the government of any unexplained wealth manifestly out of proportion to his salaries and other lawful income.
No comments:
Post a Comment